HOME    PRESS ROOM    CONTACT US    ARE YOU PREGNANT?     SUBSCRIBE   |   CONTRIBUTE   |   RESOURCES  |    SEARCH
RCRC - Religious 
				Coalition for Reproductive Choice
ABOUT US PERSPECTIVES ISSUES GET INVOLVED PROGRAMS

NEWS
Latest News
Views

Faith in Action
Call to Justice
State Affiliates
Clergy for Choice
Black Church Initiative
SYRF
SYRF
In Good Conscience
Prayers & Sermons
Healthy Families
Healthy Families
 

BACK TO NEWS 

News

National Religious Coalition Deeply Concerned by HHS Secretary’s Disregard for Women’s Reproductive Health Care
Leavitt’s Statement Contrary to Widely Held American Values

Statement of Reverend Carlton W. Veazey
President and CEO, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice

March 18, 2008
Washington, DC--The Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, the national coalition of mainstream religious and religiously affiliated organizations, is deeply concerned about the disregard for women’s reproductive health care and for women themselves in the statement issued late Friday by Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt. The Bush Administration official called for the rejection of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' (ACOG) fair-minded new policy to require its members who object to abortion to refer their patients seeking abortion to another physician.

Leavitt’s position--that the moral objections of a physician take priority over the moral decisions and medical needs of the woman--is contrary to widely held American values of church/state separation and respect for individual conscience, as shown in RCRC’s ground-breaking study of health care decision-making.

The three-year RCRC study, “In Good Conscience- Guidelines for the Ethical Provision of Health Care in a Pluralistic Society,” which was released in 2007, was conducted with Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, and Muslim clergy, ethicists, theologians, health care providers, and health care advocates. A major finding was that American religious and secular values hold that medical professionals have a responsibility to provide timely and adequate medical care and that, while an individual’s conscientious objection must be protected, it cannot be at the cost of good patient care and it cannot control or restrict the legal and moral decisions of others.

ACOG's principled and sensible policy would leave untouched a physician's right to refuse to provide abortions—a right that has been spelled out in law since 1973—but would ensure that the patient received the services she needed and wanted. Secretary Leavitt's dogmatic indifference to the patient is bad medicine, misguided ethics, and political pandering. A great nation must make room for diverse beliefs—especially a nation founded on the principle of religious freedom.

The Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice is the national interfaith coalition of organizations with official statements in support of reproductive choice and justice, including the Episcopal Church, three agencies of the Presbyterian Church (USA), United Church of Christ, the United Methodist Church General Board of Church and Society and Women's Division, Reform, Conservative, and Reconstructionist Judaism, Unitarian Universalism, Catholics for Choice, and other groups. RCRC’s programs include Clergy for Choice, Seminarians for Choice, Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom, the National Black Church Initiative, La Iniciativa Latina, public policy and public information and advocacy.