 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
BACK
TO NEWS
News
Lacking Basis, Christians Fight
Abortion
By The Rev. C. Joshua Villines
Joshua Villines is an ordained minister in the United Church of
Christ. He served for several years as a pastor in Atlanta, and
is currently completing a Ph.D. at Vanderbilt University.
This article was published in the Atlanta Journal Constitution on
03/20/06 and reprinted by permission of the author.
Those who seek to outlaw abortion often use the rhetoric of "protecting
the most vulnerable and helpless" in our communities. Many
of them are Christians who see their opposition to abortion rights
as inextricably linked with their faith and their understanding
of Christian ethics. After all, wouldn't a God of love and life
want us to protect life wherever we found it?
If only it were that simple.
In practice, there are other questions we must ask. Does a God of
love and life ever support war? Does such a God understand that
some innocent civilians will die when we fight to protect our freedoms?
In other words, does God approve when we make the decision to kill
other people to protect our quality of life? What about when we
kill to prevent genocide? Does God have a holy balancing scale that
weighs intangibles like "intent" and "the greater
good" or one that compares the number of innocent lives lost
against the number of innocent lives saved?
We do not know. For every Christian with a "God Bless Our Troops"
sticker on their bumper there is another with "Who Would Jesus
Bomb?" on their rear windshield.
If my experience as a pastor is any indication, it is unlikely that
the driver of either car would be making their point from the kind
of complex theological arguments I learned in seminary. In practice,
our upbringings, our biases and our circumstances have much more
to do with what we believe God thinks; and we are often inconsistent.
How else could we spend millions of dollars to oppose abortion —
despite no clear biblical argument for or against it — and
ignore the overwhelming number of biblical texts that explicitly
command us to care for the poor?
For the vast majority of Christians, it is not about consistency
— it is about convenience. Even those of us who speak passionately
about protecting the weak often forget that our willingness to purchase
cheap goods produced by exploited workers sentences children to
poverty, disease, violence and death. The cars that we drive, the
food that we allow to be marketed to children, the tax breaks we
support or oppose, they all have a life-or-death impact on the most
vulnerable among us. It is not only in war that we make decisions
to value one life over another. Consciously or not, we do it every
time we go to the supermarket.
The issue of abortion is not about whether life starts at conception.
There are convincing arguments either way. The issue is which carries
more weight: the life that may be in the embryo, or the life and
needs of the woman in whose body that embryo was conceived?
After spending time in women's health clinics, I have come to realize
that the "most vulnerable and helpless" who need our active
protection are the women and couples who are faced with the agonizingly
difficult decision to terminate a pregnancy. As a Christian pastor,
I strongly support protecting the right of women to make this decision.
Other Christian pastors have chosen otherwise, and our division
on this issue is proof that there is no Christian consensus here.
The far right, however, has been able to set the issue of abortion
apart from all of the other controversial, life-or-death decisions
we make every day. Abortion is not a special case; and I pray that
the guardians of our Constitution will continue to protect our freedom
to choose our own priorities in all of these weighty matters.
The beliefs or prejudices of some, regardless of who has a majority,
should not be used to take the choice out of the hands of the woman
who will be the main bearer, perhaps the only bearer, of the consequences
of her decision.
|
|
 |